Updates

Work and life has been keeping me busy this past couple of weeks. While I have time to read, I haven't time to blog or visit other blogs much - sorry!

Here are a few reviews coming up when I find the time!

• Loving Frank by Nancy Horan
• Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins
• The Red Tree by Shaun Tan
• Poison Study by Maria Snyder

Not finished yet - I started A Purse of Your Own: An Easy Guide to Financial Security by Deborah Owens and Brenda Lane Richardson. I am on p98 (of 290), and decided that I want to buy a copy of this book, as there were many resources I want to highlight and keep a copy handy. I will review once I finish the book, but so far I'm liking it a lot - I don't know a lot about finances apart from not spending more than what we have (well, excluding student loan and mortgage) and feel like we really need to learn a little more about money and investing for the future.

Next read is Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. I have read the authors' first book, Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die and really enjoyed it (and learned from it) so can't wait to read the 2nd book! Bumping this book up as I need to return it by Friday 5/28.

Then after that will probably read Moloka'i by Alan Brennert as I need to return it by 6/1 - but if I can renew it then it may not be the next one yet (there are 2 copies out, both due by 6/1, and there is a hold on it. So if the other borrower returns it sooner than I do, then I will be able to renew!)

Happy reading!!

Book Review - The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot

Title: The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks  
Author: Rebecca Skloot  
Year: 2010
Page: 384  
Genre: Non-Fiction - Science  

New to me author? Yes    
Read this author again? Yes!
Tearjerker? A little teary eyed  
Where did it take place? US  
FTC Disclosure: Borrowed from the library at work  

Summary (from amazon.com):  
Science journalist Skloot makes a remarkable debut with this multilayered story about faith, science, journalism, and grace. It is also a tale of medical wonders and medical arrogance, racism, poverty and the bond that grows, sometimes painfully, between two very different women—Skloot and Deborah Lacks—sharing an obsession to learn about Deborah's mother, Henrietta, and her magical, immortal cells. Henrietta Lacks was a 31-year-old black mother of five in Baltimore when she died of cervical cancer in 1951. Without her knowledge, doctors treating her at Johns Hopkins took tissue samples from her cervix for research. They spawned the first viable, indeed miraculously productive, cell line—known as HeLa. These cells have aided in medical discoveries from the polio vaccine to AIDS treatments. What Skloot so poignantly portrays is the devastating impact Henrietta's death and the eventual importance of her cells had on her husband and children. Skloot's portraits of Deborah, her father and brothers are so vibrant and immediate they recall Adrian Nicole LeBlanc's Random Family. Writing in plain, clear prose, Skloot avoids melodrama and makes no judgments. Letting people and events speak for themselves, Skloot tells a rich, resonant tale of modern science, the wonders it can perform and how easily it can exploit society's most vulnerable people.

First Sentence:
There's a photo on my wall of a woman I've never met, its left corner torn and patched together with tape.

Why did I pick this book?
I first heard about this book on a online forum. It sounded interesting enough that I put it on my TBR. Thought I'd read it sometime later as I have a big piles of books to read yet. However, I saw that my workplace was going to have a book discussion about it - I work in a pretty big healthcare company so I thought it'd be interesting to talk about this book with others from the same field. So I bumped this up to be read first so I can participate in the discussion.   

My thoughts:

• As I mentioned in an earlier post, if you are just going to read one non-fiction book this year, read this book! To sum it up in one word - FASCINATING! I didn't quite know what to expect, I thought it may be a little dry since it's about science and cells and cells research... but it is a lot more than that. It is about ethics, patient rights, race, family and love as well. One of the participants in the book discussion put it quite well together - this book is a bridge - it helps non-scientists understand a bit of science (and make us more aware of our rights as patients too) but at the same time it helps scientists to understand the human side of the story. There were definitely parts of that books that made me ached, amused and cried. Skloot's writing made this a very easy to read book.

• I learned a lot from this book - I guess that's why I like reading non-fiction because I get to learn about things I normally won't. While I was in school, I read fiction to escape, but now that I am not in school, I read non-fiction to keep on learning. I was not disappointed with this book. I didn't know about the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, The Hospital for The Negro Insane, that scientists inject cancer cells in patients to see if the cancer will spread, that the cells are named after the patient it comes from - with the first two letters from the first name and the first two letters from the last name -- e.g. Henrietta Lacks' cells are known as HeLa.

• I didn't quite like the cover when I first saw it - it certainly didn't make me want to pick it up to take a looksy. But now that I have read the book, I understand the photo and the orangy background.

• Skloot took over 10 years to put the book together, and it required a lot of persistence, bravery, patience and courage. The book did go back and forth a little in terms of time line - to tell both Henrietta's story and Henrietta's daughter's story (her name was Deborah, nicknamed Dale). Henrietta died when Dale was one I liked that it had a timeline at the top of each chapter to let you know which year this chapter was set at.

• Wired magazine has a timeline of what HeLa cells were used for throughout the years - all the different vaccine and research on genetics and space biology and others

• The story also made me a little sad - poverty, lack of education, lack of access to medical needs... One of the main individual in the story died the day after Mother's Day in 2009. I finished reading this book the day after Mother's Day in 2010. What a coincidence. 

• The most touching scene for me involved Henrietta's son Joe/Zakariyya and Christoph Lengauer and Rebecca Skloot, after seeing his mother's cells for the first time, and after Christopher explaining what a cell and DNA and chromosome is. And how HeLa helped cell research. It is hard to explain why it was touching without giving the story away. But it provided some closure for him and he showed his appreciation in a way that I didn't expect. His sister, Dale, said to Skloot afterward, "Girl, you just witnessed a miracle." (p267)

• The "afterword" was quite long and a little dry - I'm glad the rest of the book wasn't written in the same manner! Since I had to return the book the next day, I didn't really read every word here...

• There were 10 pages of acknowledgement! It also includes an extensive list of sources that Skloot cited.

• I am going to include A LOT OF quotes -  Some of the quotes may be SPOILERS - so be aware if you don't want to find out what happened. I am including them as a reminder to myself of the different things I learned in the book.

• I'd rate this book as a 4.5. Why not a 5? Only because I haven't decided if I need to go buy this book and own it yet. And I don't know if I'd re-read.

Quote:

Henrietta's Immortality

"Henrietta's cells have now been living outside her body for longer than they ever lived inside it," Defler said. If we went to almost any cell culture lab in the world and opened its freezers, he told us, we'd probably find millions - if not billions - of Henrietta's cells in small vials on ice. (p4)

"It sounds strange," he said, "but her cells done lived goner than her memory." (p118)

Race

Years later I'd understand how a young boy could know why I was calling just from the sound of my voice: the only time white people called Day was when they wanted something having to do with HeLa cells. But at the time I was confused. (p54)

A few minutes later, seemingly out of nowhere, he pointed to the dirt and said, "You know, white folks and black folds all buried over top of each other in here. I guess old white granddaddy and his brothers was buried in here too. Really no tellin who in this ground now." Only thing he knew for sure, he said, was that there was something beautiful about the idea of slave-owning white Lackses being buried under their black kin. "They spending eternity in the same place," he told me, laughing. "They must've worked out their problems by now!" (p122)

When I arrived in Clover (in VA in 1999), race was still ever-present. Roseland was "The nice colored fellow" who ran Rosie's before it shut down; Bobcat was "the white man" who ran the mini-mart; Henrietta went to St. Matthew's, "the colored church." One of the first things Cootie said when I met him was, "You don't act strange around me cause I'm black. You're not from around here." (p124)

    Ruby (and Carlton Lacks, the oldest white Lackses in Clover, in 1999) was in her late eighties too, with a sharp mind that seemed decades younger than her frail body. She talked right over Carlton, telling me about their grandfather who'd farmed the Lacks Plantation, and their relation to Ben and Albert Lacks. When I mentioned that Henrietta came from Lacks Town, Ruby straightened in her chair. "Well, that was colored!" she snapped.
    "I don't know what you talking bout. You're not talking about coloreds are you?"
    I told her I wanted to learn about both the white and black Lackses.
    "Well, we never did know each other," she said. "the white and the black didn't mix then, not like they do now, which I can't say I like because I don't think it's for the best." She paused and shook her head. "Mixing them like that, during school and church and everything, they end up white and black get together and marry and all... I just can't see the sense in it." (p125)

Ethics

The Tuskegee syphilis study - they recruited hundreds of African-American men with syphilis, then watched them die slow, painful, and preventable deaths, even after they realized penicillin could cure them. The research subjects didn't ask questions. They were poor and uneducated, and the researchers offered incentives: free physical exams, hot meals, and rides into town on clinic days, plus fifty-dollar burial stipends for their families when the men died (p50)

    In February 1954, Southam loaded a syringe with saline solution mixed with HeLa. He slid the needle into the forearm of a woman who'd recently been hospitalized for leukemia, then pushed the plunger, injecting about 5 million of Henriettta's cells into her arm. Using a second needle, Southam tattooed a tiny speck of India ink next to the small bump that formed at the HeLa injection site. That way, he'd know where to look when he reexamined the woman days, weeks, and months later, to see if Henrietta's cancer was growing on her arm. He repeated this process with about a dozen other cancer patients. He told them he was testing their immune systems; he said nothing about injecting them with someone else's malignant cells.
   Within hours, the patients' forearms grew red and swollen. Five to ten days later, hard nodules began growing at the injection sites. Southam removed some of the nodules to verify that they were cancerous, but he left several to see if the patients' immune systems would reject them or the cancer would spread. Within two weeks, some of the nodules had grown to 2 cm -- about the size of Henrietta's rumor when she went in for her radium treatments.
    Southam eventually removed most of the HeLa tumors, and those he didn't remove vanished on their own in a few months. But in four patients, the nodules grew back. he removed them, but they returned again and again. In one patient, Henrietta's cancer cells metastasized to her lymph nodes.
    Since those patients all had cancer to begin with, Southam wanted to see how healthy people reacted to the injections, for comparison's sake. (p128)

    Southam began injecting prisoners in June 1956 using HeLa cells that his colleague, Alice Moore, carried from new York to Ohio in a handbag. Sixty0five prisoners -- murderers, embezzlers, robbers, and forgers -- lined up on wooden benches for their injections. Some wore white hospital garb; other came off work gangs wearing blue dungarees.
    Some tumors grew on the prisoners' arms just as they'd grown in the cancer patients. The press ran story after story about the brave men at the Ohio Penitentiary, praising them as "the first healthy human beings ever to agree to such rigorous cancer experiments." They quoted one man saying, "I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried. You lie there on your bunk knowing you've got cancer in your arm... Boy, what you think about!"
    Again and again reporters asked, "Why did you volunteer for this test?"
    The prisoners' replies were like a refrain: "I done a girl a great injustice, and I think it'll pay back a little bit what I did to her."
   "I believe the wrong that I have done, in the eyes of society, this might make a right on it."
   Southam gave multiple cancer cell injections to each prisoner, and unlike the terminally ill patients, those men fought off the cancer completely. And with each new injection, their bodies responded faster, which seemed to indicate that the cells were increasing the inmates' immunity to cancer. When Southam reported his results, the press hailed them as a tremendous breakthrough that could someday lead to a cancer vaccine. (p129)

And though the American medical Association had issued rules protecting laboratory animals in 1910, no such rules existed for humans until Nuremberg (in 1947, a ten-point code of ethics now know has the Nuremberg Code.) (p131)

The Hospital for The Negro Insane

The Crownsville that Elsie died in was far worse than anythign Deborah had imagined. Patients arrived from a nearby institution packed in a train car. In 1955, the year Elsie died, the population of Crownsville was at a record high of more than 2,700 patients, nearly 800 over maximum capacity. In 1948, the only year figures were available, Cronwsville averaged 1 dor for every 225 patients, and tis death rate was far higher than its discharge rate. Patients were locked in poorly ventilated cell blocks with drains on the floors instaed of toilets. Black men, women, and children suffering with everything from dementia and TB to "nervousness," "lack of self-confidence," and epilepsy were packed into every conceivable space, including windowless basement rooms and barred-in porches. When they had beds, they usually slept two or more on a twin mattress, lying head to foot, forced to crawl across a sea of sleeping bodies to reach their beds. Inmates weren't separated by age or sex, and often included sex offenders. There were riots and homemade weapons. Unruly patients were tied to their beds or secluded in locked rooms. (p275)

I later learned that while Elsie was at Crownsville, scientists often conducted research on patients there without consent, including one study titled "Pneumoencephalographic and skull X-ray studies in 100 epileptics." Pneumoencephalography was a technique developed in 1919 for taking images of the brain, which floats in a sea of fluid. That fluid protects the brain from damage, but makes it very difficult to X-ray, since images taken through fluid are cloudy. Pneumoencephalography involved drilling holes into the skulls of research subjects, draining the fluid surrounding their brains, and pumping air or helium into the skull in place of the fluid to allow crisp X-rays of the brain through the skull. The side effects -- crippling headaches, dizziness, seizures, vomiting -- lasted until they body naturally refilled the skull with spinal fluid, which usually took 2 to 3 months. Because pneumoencephalography could cause permanent brain damage and paralysis, it was abandoned in the 1970s. (p276)

Love for a mother

Christoph (Lengauer, a Ph.D. student who'd used HeLa to help develop something called fluorescence in situ hybridization, otherwise known as FISH, a technique for painting chromosomes with multicolored fluorescent dyes that shine bright under ultraviolet light. Tot he trained eye, FISH can uncover detailed information about a person's DNA. To the untrained eye, it simply creates a beautiful mosaic of colored chromosomes.
    Christoph had framed a 14x20" print of Henrietta's chromosomes that he'd "paitned" using FISH. It looked like a photograph of a night sky filled with multicolored fireflies glowing red, blue, yellow, green, purple and turquoise.
    "I want to tell them a little what HeLa means to me as a young cancer researcher, and how grateful I am for their donation years ago," he wrote. "I do not represent Hopkins, but I am part of it. In a way I might even want to apologize."
   Deborah threw her black canvas tote bag onto the floor, tore the wrapping paper from the photo, then held the frame at arm's length in front of her. She said nothing, just ran through a set of French doors onto a small patio to see the picture in the setting sunlight.
    "They're beautiful!" she yelled from the porch. "I never knew they were so pretty!" She walked back inside clutching the picture, her cheeks flushed. "You know what's weird? The world got more pictures of my other cells than it do of her. I guess that's why nobody knows who she is. Only thing left of her is them cells." (p235)

    Christoph kept talking about cell divison, but Deborah wasn't listening. She stood mesmerized, watching one of her mother's cells divide in two, just as they'd done when Henrietta was an embryo in her mother's womb.
    Deborah and Zakariyya stared at the screen like they'd gone into a trance, mouths open, cheeks sagging. It was the closest they'd come to seeing their mother alive since they were babies. (p265)

Then she knelt on the ground, next to the sunken strips of earth where she imagined her mother and sister were buried. "Take one of me and my sister by her and my mother grave," she said. "It'll be the only picture in the world with the three of us almost together." (p287)

"I often visit her hair in the Bible," Deborah said into the camera. "When I think about this hair, I'm not as lonely. I imagine, what would it be like to have a mother to go to, to laugh, cry, hug." (p309).

Wisdom

Lurz sat in his chair, legs crossed, looking at the photo of Elsie. "You have to be prepared," he told Deborah, his voice gentle. "Sometimes learning can be just as painfula s not knowing." (p271)

As we left Crownsville, Deborah thanked Lurz for the information, saying, "I've been waiting for this a long, long time, Doc." When he asked if she was okay, her eyes welled with tears and she said, "Like I'm always telling my brothers, if you gonna go into history, you can't do it with a hate attitude. You got to remember, times was different." (p276)

"Man brought nothing into this world and he'll carry nothing out. Sometime we care about stuff too much. We worry when there's nothing to worry about." (p289)

Rating:  4.5 Stars 

Have you read this book? 
If you have, I would love to hear what you think! I'll link your review here if you wish!

Challenges:
100+ Reading
Science Books 
Non-Fiction

Reading Habits - Meme

I don't usually do meme... I don't have the discipline to do them regularly. But this one about reading habits from Helen's Book Blog seems like fun! :)

Do you snack while you read? If so, favourite reading snack:
During the week, I usually read while having lunch (so not really snack) or riding the bus (no food allowed). Trying to loose weight too so usually don't have snack at home. But when I could snack, I love to read and eat cookies! But don't you hate cookie crumbs getting trapped in the binder of t he book...

What is your favourite drink while reading?
I am trying to drink more water, so usually water! But I like refreshing juice or smoothie too.

Do you tend to mark your books as you read, or does the idea of writing in books horrify you?
Since most of my books are from the library, I can't mark the books! For those I own - I don't usually mark fiction, but if it's non-fiction and I want to go back later for reference, I do high-light or underline or scribble on the side or on the front page or back page. When I bought second hand book, it's kinda fun to read what the previous owner(s) have written :) Though I have seen some books I borrowed from the library (seemed like mostly books written in Chinese) where people would correct the typo!

How do you keep your place while reading a book? Bookmark? Dog-ears? Laying the book flat open?
Again, since I borrow from the library, I don't want to dog-ears books. In fact, I yelled at my sister for doing so :) Nowadays since I blog my reviews, I will usually have a blank piece of thick paper as my bookmark, where I can jot down the page number for quotes and thoughts.

Fiction, non-fiction, or both?
Both. Last couple of years were 70% non-fiction. This year I'm expanding my fiction genre. So I'm thinking it'd be 50-50. So far I've read 12 non-fiction and 23 fiction (excluding 3 graphic novels, as I have no idea if they should fall under fiction or non-fiction).

Are you a person who tends to read to the end of a chapter, or can you stop anywhere?
While I read at lunch, I tend to finish a chapter. During the bus ride, pretty much just anywhere at the end of a paragraph (easier to find the spot again) - though I try to stop at the spot where it has a big physical printing gap in the paragraphs if possible, since it makes it even easier to pick off where I left it. I'd been falling asleep lately while reading in bed before sleep... so wherever my eyes involuntarily closed (I wish I could stay up late to read every night.)

Are you the type of person to throw a book across the room or on the floor if the author irritates you?
I do it mentally. But, I respect the books I borrow from the library so I don't do that. For the books I bought, I'm too stingy to destroy a book I paid for!

If you come across an unfamiliar word, do you stop and look it up right away?
When I first moved to Australia as a teenager, with English not being my first language, I'd do that. But I found it really take the fun out of reading (and disrupting) as I had to stop way too often! Nowadays, I only look it up if it's something critical to understand the story. Most of the time I could guess (though I suppose if I guess wrong I wouldn't know it!)

What are you currently reading?
Almost finish with Loving Frank by Nancy Horan - April book club read. Need to get it read by Tuesday! Too many to choose from for the next book... I wish I can read faster!

What is the last book you bought?
A bunch of books from the library book sale before my vacation to Hong Kong and Guam - thought I'd take them with me on the trip. Some of them are: Dibs in Search of Self by Virginia Axline, Is There No Place On Earth for Me? by Susan Sheehan, Miracles Happen by Mary Kay Ash, To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design by Henry Petroski and Politically Correct Bedtime Stories: Modern Tales for Our Life and Times by James Finn Garner.

Are you the type of person that reads one book at a time, or can you read more than one?
Mostly one book at a time. Every so often may have two going on - e.g. if I'm about to finish one, I'll bring a new book to work the next day instead so I won't run out of books to read!

Do you have a favourite time/place to read?
I pretty much always have a book with me. But if I have a choice - on a comfy couch, next to the window, with the gentle sun shinning through the sheer curtain creating a soft-box effect (soft lighting.) With a refreshing drink and cookies nearby :) No interruption please! Oh and some comfy cushions and a blankkie.

Do you prefer series books or stand alones?
Don't really have a preference. Probably read more stand alones. Some long series I'd been reading had gone done hill (looking at you, Ms. Patricia Cornwell... I'd loved Dr Kay Scarpetta so much - that I could really identify with her (though I'm not quite as smart and don't have a medical degree) - but now, she and her friends disappoint me... and the storyline became too Hollywood-like.

Is there a specific book or author you find yourself recommending over and over?
Since I kinda have a different reading taste to others (tend to prefer non-fiction and not many people like it), I tend to recommend fiction only, such as The Help and Still Alice and The Hunger Games. Books that took me by surprise and affect me personally. If people want to start reading non-fiction, I typically recommend starting with memoir (sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction) like The Glass Castle and Running with Scissors.

How do you organize your books? (by genre, title, author's last name, etc.)
My own books are still in boxes and not unpacked (long story...). For the large number of library books I borrow, I organize them into piles of fiction, non-fiction, YA and others. Then for each stack, I organize it by the ones I want to read the most on top. Then if I find out I need to return certain book sooner (i.e. can't renew), then I put them on the very top. I don't always read them in order, as I choose the next read based on my mood.


How about you? Would love to know about your reading habits too! Post a link! :)

If you only read one non-fiction book this year...

I'd highly recommend The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.

Wow. What a story. I learned so much from this book. Will do proper review on the weekend - will have lots of quotes!

Thank you Rebecca Skloot for writing this book. THANK YOU to Henrietta Lacks for her contribution to science (and our health) and her family for letting Rebecca wrote this book!

Updates

It's been over a month since we got back from our vacation (though I felt like we need a vacation after our vacation... since the was a very packed 3 weeks.) Work had gotten busy, house and car stuff that needed taken care of, and Husband J's 92 year old grandma gotten sick... and eventually passed away 3 weeks ago. While it was very sad, but she is not suffering anymore. It was so hard to see her in pain.

Throughout all that, I still found time to read. Reading is definitely a good escape. This past week had been a bit slow in reading due to work, but I am determined to finish The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (non-fiction) by Tuesday, as I need to return it then. I am about half way through and it is fascinating so I don't think it'd be a problem to finish it! I have this on my TBR but didn't think I'll read it so soon - but I found that a group of people (I don't know who they are!) at my (big) company is hosting a book discussion about this book on 5/18, and I want to join in! Since I work in healthcare, this will be an interesting discussion as it involves ethics and research and race and history and science... This is shaping up to be one of my favorite books this year!

On the same night (5/18) is also my local book club discussion on Loving Frank. I haven't read it yet (when I read it too soon, I tend to forget the details! So I decide from now on I'll start reading the book about a week before our meeting). So this will be up next. I don't know a lot about Frank Lloyd Wright apart from liking his architecture style (but not an expert on architecture!) so I'm looking forward to reading it. This month we'll also find out what books the group has chosen for July 2010 to June 2010. We received a list of 40 or so book suggestions back in March (we could submit choices), and gave our 15-20 picks to the librarian last month. So we'll find out in a week or so! I can't wait!! The June choice is The Accidental Tourist which I haven't heard of.

And I have 37 library books waiting for me to read too... they're screaming Pick Me! Pick Me! on the floor.  I wish I could be a full time reader! I wish I could read faster! There are some I want to read more than others. But hopefully I could get to most of them before they are due. Some of them are (not in any order):

Fiction:

• Molokai: A Novel
• The Maze Runner
• The Handmaid's Tale
• The last will of Moira Leahy 
• Flowers for Algernon 
• The housekeeper and the professor 
• Kindred
• Poison study 
• Ender's game 

Non-Fiction:

• The autobiography of an execution 
• Danger to self : on the front line with an ER psychiatrist 
• Hannah's gift : lessons from a life fully lived 
• House lust : America's obsession with our homes 
• A purse of your own : an easy guide to financial security 
• Building a meal : from molecular gastronomy to culinary constructivism 
• Gumbo tales : finding my place at the New Orleans table 
• Nature's secret messages : hidden in plain sight 
• Cookoff : recipe fever in America 
• What Einstein told his cook : kitchen science explained

Have you read any of them? Any must-read? I know I know, it's subjective :)

Book Reviews by Author (Graphic Novel)

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H



I


J


K

L



M
N

• Nepa, Andrea - Red in the Flower Bed: An Illustrated Children's Story about Interracial Adoption

O

P
Q

R


S
T

• Tan, Shaun - The Arrival 
• Tan, Shaun - The Lost Thing 
• Tan, Shaun - The Red Tree 
• Tatsumi, Yoshihiro and Tomin, Adrian - The Push Man and Other Stories [Did Not Finish]
• Thompson, Craig - Blankets: An Illustrated Novel 

U

V

W

X


Y

• Yang, Gene Luen - American Born Chinese 

Z

Book Review - We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson

Title: We Have Always Lived in the Castle    
Author: Shriley Jackson  
Year: 1962  
Page: 160  
Genre: Fiction - Horror 

New to me author? Yes
Read this author again? Not sure
Tearjerker? No
Where did it take place? US?
FTC Disclosure: Borrowed from the library (thanks to inter-library loan!)

Summary (from amazon.com):
Taking readers deep into a labyrinth of dark neurosis, We Have Always Lived in the Castle is a deliciously unsettling novel about a perverse, isolated, and possibly murderous family and the struggle that ensues when a cousin arrives at their estate.

First Sentence:  
My name is Mary Katherine Blackwood.

Why did I pick this book?
After I read Liar by Justine Larbalestier, other people asked on the author's website if there are similar books. Since I thought Liar has such potential (and spoiled by the ending, in my opinion), I thought I'd give this book a try as others have said this is a similar type of book. The author has also said she loved this book.

My thoughts:

• I think my expectation was way to high and I was very disappointed by this book! I can see why the readers said this is a similar type of book as Liar (I don't want to explain as it'd spoil it), but it is just not my cup of tea. Many reviews said this is creepy, horrifying, scary, disturbing, haunting, strange... I thought it was boring and could guess the twist 1/3 way of the book (and it's a pretty thin book!) I wasn't scared or creep out or disturbed or haunted at all (unlike after watching IT the TV movie in 8th grade... I almost didn't want to turn on the faucet to wash my hands!)

• As I was reading the story (would have given it up had I not wanted to find out what was so great about this book), I kept thinking, how old is Mary Katherine the protagonist? It was very hard to guess her age by her voice/behavior. When I read some amazon reviews, some reviewers mentioned she was 18 and I was wondering how they came up with that age. When I looked back at the first page of the book to write out what the first sentence was - the 2nd sentence said, "I am eighteen years old, and I live with my sister Constance." Duh! But really, I'd already forgotten about that fact as I read the book...

• I still don't get why this book is so popular... have you read it? Could you share your thoughts please?? I didn't even find a quote I liked in the book...

• The only thing I like about it is this - the protagonist, Mary Katherine, is called Merricat, by her sister. I thought that was cute. 

Rating:    1 Star

Have you read this book? 
If you have, I would love to hear what you think! I'll link your review here if you wish!

Challenges:
100+ Reading